We track our own AI visibility.
Watch us fix it live.
In August 2026, AI engines mentioned Launch at Dawn in 0 of 25 answers across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity — including a named-brand query about our own services. This page is the live, auto-verifiable record of the fix. No hand-typed numbers: every score below is read from the same scan tables client dashboards use.
Current readout · our business
AI mention rate
0%
Latest: 2026-09-01
Citation rate
0%
Sentiment
50
Responses in latest run
25
Fixes shipped
0
Verified by rescan
0/0
Measured lift (points)
—
Visibility trend · last — scan days
No rescan has landed on this business yet. The 25-response baseline (0 mentions) from 2026-09-01 is the starting point on the chart.
Step 1 · The baseline
0 for 25. Even when we asked about ourselves.
On 2026-09-01 our tracked batch ran 25 responses: 10 buyer prompts across multiple AI engines. Every single answer failed to mention Launch at Dawn — including the direct named-brand query “What services does Launch at Dawn offer for enterprise SEO architecture?” The site had schema, robots.txt, llms.txt — but no answer content AI could cite.
So the fix wasn't more schema. It was giving every tracked prompt a citable page that answers it directly.
Step 2 · The fix we shipped
No fixes recorded for this business yet.
Auto-verifiable, not staged
When we get re-scanned, this page re-scores itself.
We run the loop on ourselves
Others report the problem. We ship the fix — and prove it.
Gap discovered
0/25
mentions at the baseline scan
Fixes shipped
0
recorded in our own fix log
Verified by rescan
0/0
lift measured automatically
Live mention rate
—
from our own scan records
The honest questions
Yes. Launch at Dawn runs the exact same AI visibility scan it sells to clients against its own business — the same prompts × engines matrix, stored in the same scan_responses and metrics_history tables this page reads live.
Dogfood ID b3d2ae72 · data refreshed on page load from Supabase
← Back to case studies